EUA

Trump orders National Guard to D.C. after attack on ex-DOGE staffer

Trump
Trump - Foto: Joshua Sukoff / Shutterstock.com Trump - Photo: Joshua Sukoff / Shutterstock.com

On August 11, 2025, U.S. President Donald Trump announced the deployment of the National Guard and federal control over Washington D.C.’s police force, following a violent attack on Edward Coristine, a 19-year-old former staffer of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Known by his nickname “Big Balls,” Coristine was injured while thwarting an attempted carjacking in the capital, prompting Trump to declare a 30-day federal intervention to curb crime. The move, which includes sending approximately 800 troops, has drawn sharp criticism from local officials, including Mayor Muriel Bowser, who called it “unprecedented and unnecessary.” The decision highlights ongoing tensions over D.C.’s autonomy and reignites debates about public safety in the U.S. capital.

The assault on Coristine took place in the early hours of August 3 in D.C.’s Logan Circle neighborhood. According to police reports, a group of about ten teenagers approached Coristine and his companion, demanding their car. Coristine pushed the woman into the vehicle for safety and confronted the group, resulting in a severe beating that left him with a suspected concussion and a broken nose. Two 15-year-olds from Hyattsville, Maryland, were arrested, but other suspects remain at large.

  • Incident details: The attempted carjacking occurred at 3 a.m. in the 1400 block of Swann Street, Northwest.
  • Coristine’s response: He protected his companion by pushing her into the car before facing the attackers.
  • Police intervention: A nearby patrol car disrupted the assault, leading to two arrests.
  • Stolen item: A $1,000 iPhone 16 was taken during the attack.

Trump amplified the incident by sharing a photo of a bloodied Coristine on Truth Social, describing him as an “incredible young man” targeted by “local thugs.”

Trump’s response and federalization push

Trump’s reaction was swift and decisive. In a White House address, he labeled crime in Washington as “out of control” and announced the mobilization of the National Guard alongside federal oversight of the Metropolitan Police Department. The intervention, set to last 30 days, aims to restore order and “clean up” the city, according to Trump. He also called for minors as young as 14 to be prosecuted as adults for violent crimes, a proposal that has sparked significant debate.

  • Announced measures: Deployment of 800 National Guard troops and federal control of local police.
  • Trump’s justification: Claims of a “security emergency” driven by rampant crime in D.C.
  • Legislative proposal: Advocating for tougher penalties for juvenile offenders in serious crimes.

The intervention leverages the Home Rule Act of 1973, which grants Congress authority over the District of Columbia. However, the move is seen as a test of presidential power, as D.C. has operated with limited autonomy since the establishment of its elected local government.

Background of the attack and Coristine’s profile

Edward Coristine, known as “Big Balls” from a humorous LinkedIn handle, was a prominent figure in the DOGE, a department created by Trump to cut federal spending and led by Elon Musk until June 2025. After Musk’s departure, Coristine joined the Social Security Administration (SSA) as a special employee, focusing on improving the agency’s website. His work with DOGE involved projects at agencies like USAID, the Department of Homeland Security, and the Department of Education.

The 19-year-old, hailed as a “hero” by peers like former DOGE colleague Marko Elez, gained attention for his bravery in confronting the attackers. The photo of Coristine, taken by Elez and shared by Trump, fueled calls from the president’s supporters for stronger action against crime.

  • Coristine’s career: Worked at DOGE and later at SSA on digital improvements.
  • “Big Balls” nickname: Originated from a playful LinkedIn choice reflecting his bold persona.
  • Public reaction: Trump’s allies used the case to push for federal intervention.

Criticism and crime statistics in D.C.

The federal takeover has faced strong opposition from local leaders. Mayor Muriel Bowser described the intervention as “alarming” and emphasized that crime rates in Washington have been declining. According to the Metropolitan Police Department, violent crime dropped 26% in 2025 compared to 2023, with homicides reaching their lowest level in 30 years in 2024. Carjackings, like the one targeting Coristine, also decreased by 38% in 2025.

D.C.’s Attorney General, Brian Schwalb, labeled the intervention “illegal” and vowed to challenge it legally. He argued that the city has been addressing juvenile crime effectively, with arrests and prosecutions when evidence supports charges.

  • Crime decline: Violent crime fell 26% in 2025, per police data.
  • Homicides: 2024 saw the lowest murder rate since 1994.
  • Carjackings: Down 38% in 2025 compared to the previous year.
  • Legal response: Schwalb plans to contest the intervention in court.

Debate over Washington’s autonomy

The intervention reignites a long-standing debate over Washington D.C.’s autonomy. As a federal district, D.C. lacks statehood and is subject to Congressional oversight. The Home Rule Act of 1973 granted the city an elected mayor and council, but Congress retains the power to override local laws. Trump, who has expressed interest in federalizing D.C. since January 2025, had previously floated the idea during a July cabinet meeting.

The D.C. National Guard, uniquely under direct presidential control, allows Trump to bypass local approval for deployments, unlike in states. Critics, including Bowser, argue that the intervention undermines local democracy and disregards the will of D.C.’s residents, who overwhelmingly support Democrats.

  • Home Rule Act: Grants Congress authority over D.C., but full federalization requires legislative approval.
  • D.C. National Guard: Reports directly to the president, enabling unilateral action.
  • Historical tensions: Republicans often criticize Democratic management of the city.

Public reactions and political fallout

The assault on Coristine and the subsequent intervention have polarized opinions. Trump supporters, including Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, praised Coristine as a “hero” and endorsed the federal takeover as a necessary step to restore order. Conversely, Democrats and local activists view the move as an overreach and an attempt by Trump to consolidate power.

Elon Musk, former DOGE head, also weighed in, supporting federalization and commending Coristine’s actions. However, his account of the incident, suggesting Coristine intervened to save a woman from assault, differs from the police report, which indicates the attack stemmed from a carjacking attempt.

  • Support from allies: Greene and Musk backed the intervention and praised Coristine.
  • Democratic criticism: Bowser and Schwalb accused Trump of exaggerating the crisis.
  • Polarization: The incident deepened divisions between Republicans and Democrats in D.C.

Implications for security and local population

Trump’s intervention also targets homelessness, with the president demanding that D.C.’s roughly 5,600 unhoused individuals leave the city “immediately.” The 2024 Department of Housing report ranked D.C. 15th among U.S. cities for homelessness. Trump promised shelters outside the capital but provided no details on implementation, raising concerns among human rights groups about potential forced evictions.

The deployment of the National Guard and federal control of local police could heighten tensions in communities already grappling with gun violence and inequality. Recent polls show D.C. residents are worried about losing autonomy and the impact of heavy-handed federal measures.

  • Homelessness: D.C. had over 5,600 unhoused people in 2024, per federal data.
  • Trump’s plan: Relocation of unhoused individuals to shelters outside the city.
  • Social risks: Intervention may exacerbate tensions and inequalities in D.C.
To Top