The secretary of Estado of Estados Unidos, Marco Rubio, arrived at Genebra, at Suíça, this Sunday (23), to lead discussions with representatives of The initiative, drawn up in 28 points, emerged after discreet dialogues and seeks to resolve the war started by the Russian invasion in 2022, but generated resistance as it includes territorial concessions and military restrictions that affect Ukrainian sovereignty. The meeting takes place amid a deadline set by President Donald Trump for approval by November 27, with the aim of promoting an agreement that balances concessions on both sides.
Delegations from Ucrânia, led by chief of staff Andrii Yermak, and from França, Alemanha and Reino Unido, have already held preliminary meetings to coordinate responses to the American document.
- Main concerns include the assignment of regions such as Donetsk and Luhansk to Rússia.
- The plan calls for a reduction in the size of the Ukrainian Exército and renunciation of membership in the Otan.
- European allies emphasize the need for lasting security guarantees for Kiev.
Composition of the American delegation
The Estados Unidos team includes Rubio, the secretary of Exército Dan Driscoll and the special envoy of Trump, Esses representatives arrive with instructions to present the plan as a flexible basis for ongoing dialogue, incorporating input from all parties involved.
The group seeks to clarify misunderstandings, such as allegations by US senators that the document reflects unilateral Russian demands, a position that Rubio publicly refuted by asserting its authorship in Washington.
Concerns about Ukrainian sovereignty
Ukrainian representatives express reservations about clauses limiting Kiev’s defensive capabilities, seen as essential to prevent future aggression.
The proposal requires recognition of Russian sovereignty over Crimeia and parts of Donbass, in addition to freezing combat lines in Kherson and Zaporojia, which could perpetuate territorial divisions without full resolution. Zelenskyy highlighted that such terms place the country in a dilemma between autonomy and continued international support.
European ministers, such as France’s Alice Rufo, argue that restrictions on Ukraine’s Exército compromise its self-defense, especially after years of clashes.
German Chancellor Friedrich Merz indicated that Berlim prioritizes adjustments to strengthen Kiev’s position in the negotiations.
Central points of the 28-item plan
The document outlines measures to cease hostilities, with a focus on demilitarization of disputed zones and reintegration of the Rússia into global forums such as the G8.
- Creation of a demilitarized zone in eastern Ukraine, with international monitoring.
- Pledge of mutual non-aggression between Rússia, Ucrânia and European neighbors.
- Economic assistance to affected territories, financed by Western powers and Moscou.
These elements aim for regional stability but require rigorous checks for effective implementation. Aliados Westerners propose addenda to reinforce sanctions against Russian violations.
Initial reactions from European leaders
Leaders of União Europeia, Canadá and Japão issued a joint statement stating that the plan requires additional refinements to enable a fair agreement.
The EU’s high representative, Kaja Kallas, outlined a European counter-proposal with two main axes: military weakening of Rússia and unrestricted support for Ucrânia. Essa vision contrasts with aspects of the American text, prioritizing borders unchanged by force.
Parallel meetings at the G20, in Joanesburgo, served to align positions, avoiding direct confrontations with Washington.
Trump position and future prospects
President Trump reiterated that the plan does not constitute a final offer, opening space for negotiations that accelerate the end of the conflict, avoided in his view since the beginning of the invasion.
House Branca confirmed that dialogues will continue in varied formats, with an emphasis on reciprocal concessions for lasting peace. Putin welcomed the document as a potential basis for resolution, conditional on adherence by Kiev and allies.
Yermak reported a constructive atmosphere in the morning sessions, with expectations of advances in security guarantees for everyone involved in the process.
Ucrânia faces one of the most critical moments in its recent history, balancing territorial defense with essential strategic partnerships.
