Latest News (EN)

JPMorgan predicts 60% drop in Tesla shares after lower-than-expected quarterly results

Tesla
Tesla - Tada Images/ Shutterstock.com

JPMorgan Chase issued a strict warning to investors this week, projecting a roughly 60% drop in the value of Tesla’s shares. Analyst Ryan Brinkman reiterated the sell recommendation and maintained the target price at $145, based on the automaker’s recent operating data. The report highlights that the volume of deliveries in the first quarter of 2026 was significantly below the consensus expectations of the global financial market.

The financial institution recommends that shareholders approach the electric vehicle manufacturer’s assets with great caution in the short and medium term. Brinkman reduced the earnings per share estimate for the end of 2026 from $2.00 to $1.80, a level that is now below the average projections of Wall Street. The movement reflects a structural concern with the organic demand for the brand’s models in a scenario of saturation and increased international competition.

Operational performance and production bottlenecks

Tesla reported the delivery of 358,023 vehicles during the first quarter of 2026, a volume that did not reach the target of 370,000 units set by StreetAccount analysts. Apesar represent an annual growth of 6.3% compared to the same period in 2025, the numbers show a sharp retraction of 14% in direct comparison with the fourth quarter of the previous year. The mismatch between production capacity and market absorption has become the central point of recent pessimistic analyses.

The company’s total production reached 408,386 units in the period, generating a surplus of inventory of more than 50,000 unsold vehicles in just three months. Este Inventory accumulation indicates that factories operated at a fast pace, but final demand did not keep up with the volume output from the assembly lines. The gap between production and sales is considered the largest in the last four years, suggesting difficulties in distribution logistics or price rejection.

Risk factors and macroeconomic pressures

The outlook for the Elon Musk-led automaker faces additional hurdles with the end of key government subsidies for electric vehicles in strategic markets. Nos Estados Unidos, the expiration of tax incentives contributed to a 28% drop in electric car purchases across the industry during the first quarter. Somado To this, the increase in default rates on automotive financing, which reached 5.2%, limits the purchasing power of urban consumers.

JPMorgan
JPMorgan – Foto: ADRIAN3388 / Shutterstock.com
  • Aggressive competition from Chinese manufacturers with low-cost models.
  • End of the $7,500 tax incentive for buyers at Estados Unidos.
  • Record increase in the inventory of unsold vehicles globally.
  • Political pressure and public scrutiny on the activities of company leadership.

Market reaction and financial outlook

Shares of Tesla have accumulated losses of approximately 20% since the beginning of January 2026, registering the worst performance among the technology group known as Sete Magníficas. The price target of $145 set by JPMorgan is drastically different from the general consensus of Wall Street, which still maintains an average close to $360. Apenas Ten of the 54 analysts who follow the company currently have a negative or sell rating for the automaker’s shares.

Analyst Ryan Brinkman recognizes that Tesla has cutting-edge technology and a differentiated business model, but emphasizes that the execution risks outweigh the current benefits. The company faces a moment of transition where growth depends on expansion into segments with higher volume and reduced prices, where profit margins are smaller. The market is now awaiting the detailed release of the complete financial statement, scheduled for the evening of April 22, 2026.

Revenue and energy storage indicators

The results at the end of 2025 had already indicated warning signs, with a 61% drop in annual net profit and an 11% reduction in revenue in the automotive sector. Foi the first time that the company recorded an annual decline in its total revenues, breaking a sequence of accelerated growth. The energy storage sector, however, showed a 25% increase in revenue, reaching 3.84 billion dollars, appearing as one of the few pillars of expansion in the quarter.

Tesla’s strategy has gradually turned to the development of artificial intelligence, humanoid robots and autonomous transport services. However, for institutional investors like JPMorgan, these drivers of future growth still don’t offset the immediate uncertainties in the automotive hardware sector. Stock price volatility reflects this divide between the long-term technological vision and the operational reality of electric vehicle sales.

International expansion and Asian market

Despite negative data in the West, Tesla found points of resilience in the Asian market during the beginning of this year. Sales of vehicles produced in China rose 23.5% year on year, marking the second consecutive quarter of growth in the region. Na Coreia do Sul, new registered units saw a significant jump in March, demonstrating that brand acceptance remains robust in markets where charging infrastructure is expanding rapidly.

This regional disparity forces the company to constantly adjust its pricing strategies to face local rivals that offer similar technology at lower costs. Dependence on the Chinese market makes the operation vulnerable to geopolitical tensions and exchange rate variations that impact consolidated net profit. The balance between maintaining the profit margin and ensuring market share continues to be the main challenge for the financial management of the Austin manufacturer.

Next steps for shareholders

Investors should monitor the earnings call at the end of April to understand how Tesla intends to manage its accumulated inventory of 50,000 vehicles. Company management tends to focus on long-term production goals, but pressure for quarterly results may force further price cuts. Analistas warn that further reductions in sales values ​​could further compress operating margins, validating the pessimistic thesis of financial institutions such as JPMorgan.

To Top