Justice denied protection to Júlia Trovão before she was killed by her ex-partner in Botucatu

Júlia Gabriela Bravin Trovão, 29 years old, was murdered in Botucatu, The woman had registered ten police reports for various infractions and, even so, had two requests for protective measures denied by Justiça. The last rejection occurred on the eve of the crime, shedding light on the complexity and flaws in the support system for victims of gender-based violence.

Júlia’s situation represents a serious warning about the deficiencies in combating domestic violence, where bureaucracy and the perception of risk can determine life or death. The murder in the middle of a public street, with the presence of children, shocks the community and instigates a necessary debate about the effectiveness of laws and security mechanisms currently available for threatened women.

The brutal attack and its victims

The crime occurred at Avenida Cecília Lourenção, at Residencial Ouro Verde, at Botucatu. Júlia Gabriela and his current partner, Diego Felipe Corrêa da Silva, aged 34, were brutally shot inside the car they were in, in an act of violence that had profound repercussions on the city. The attack, coldly planned and executed, left the community appalled and exposed the vulnerability of victims of violence.

Diego Felipe succumbed to his injuries and died at the scene of the attack. Júlia, despite being rescued and taken to medical care in serious condition, fought for her life for a few days, but, unfortunately, she could not resist her injuries and her death was confirmed on Tuesday, February 24, 2026. The double loss highlights the dimension of the tragedy triggered by intolerance and disregard for human life.

History of complaints and system failures

The records of Júlia Trovão against Diego Sansalone date back to May 2021, when the first police report was filed for threat and insult. Este initial case, as well as subsequent ones, ended up being archived by Justiça, an outcome that, in retrospect, points to a critical failure in the perception of the escalation of risk faced by the victim. The lack of continuity in the investigation and inaction in the face of the first warning signs contributed to a cycle of violence that culminated in the tragedy.

Over the last five years, nine additional police reports were recorded, demonstrating the ex-partner’s persistence in acts of aggression and intimidation. Estes records cover a variety of crimes, including new threats, insults, defamation, damage and even non-compliance with shared custody of the couple’s son, which has become yet another tool of control and disturbance.

The recurrence of allegations of The case highlights the urgency of a review of protocols for handling and monitoring cases of domestic violence, ensuring that complaints are treated with the seriousness and priority they deserve.

The processing of requests for protective measures

Despite the extensive reporting history, Júlia Trovão had her requests for protective orders repeatedly denied by Justiça, a central and alarming aspect of this case. The protective measure, conceived by Lei Maria of Penha as an essential instrument to safeguard the lives of women at risk, was, for Júlia, an unfulfilled promise, exposing her to imminent danger.

Two specific requests for protective measures were rejected, including the most recent, requested on Friday, February 20, 2026, just one day before the attack that would take the lives of Júlia and his current companion. The other request had been denied in October 2025.

The pattern of violence and the repetition of the aggressor

Diego Sansalone’s history was not limited to allegations of violence against Júlia. In October 2022, he was arrested for non-payment of child support, an indication of his irresponsible behavior and disregard for legal and family obligations. The arrest, which lasted a short time, resulted in his release after paying off the debt, but did not change his pattern of aggressive and controlling behavior.

The reiteration of the suspect’s acts, which ranged from threats to actions that constitute non-compliance with court decisions, demonstrates a pattern of behavior that should have been a clear signal to the authorities about the imminent risk that Júlia was running. The lack of a more forceful response from the judicial system allowed the attacker to continue his persecution, culminating in the fatal outcome.

The arrest of the suspect and the dynamics of the crime

Diego Sansalone, who fled after the shooting, was quickly identified as the main suspect in the crime. Investigations were intensified, resulting in his arrest the day after the attack. When confronted by the authorities, Sansalone confessed to the murder of Júlia Trovão and Diego Felipe Corrêa of Silva, confirming what the evidence already pointed out.

The suspect’s confession was a crucial step in advancing the investigative process, but it does not diminish the seriousness of what happened or the pain caused to the victims’ families. The police’s quick action in capturing the attacker, although fundamental, was unable to reverse the irreparable losses.

The trauma of the children present

One of the most shocking and regrettable aspects of the attack is that the two children — the 8-year-old son of Júlia and Diego Sansalone, and the 7-year-old daughter of Diego Felipe Corrêa and Silva — were present in the vehicle at the time of the shooting. Embora were not physically harmed, they were eyewitnesses to the extreme violence that claimed the lives of their parents.

The presence of children at the crime scene imposes a devastating psychological trauma, the consequences of which can be felt for years. Este is a cruel reminder of how domestic violence transcends the relationship between aggressor and victim, affecting innocent people in a profound and irreparable way. The mental health and well-being of these children require specialized attention and constant monitoring to mitigate the impacts of the traumatic experience.

Challenges in law enforcement and the search for justice

The case of Júlia Trovão highlights the challenges faced by authorities in effectively implementing Lei Maria and Penha and ensuring safety for women victims of violence. The denial of protective measures, even in the face of a history of ten police reports, suggests the need for an in-depth analysis of the criteria and sensitivity with which these requests are evaluated by the judiciary.

The search for justice for Júlia and Diego Felipe now focuses on the trial of Diego Sansalone. It is imperative that the process occurs quickly and rigorously, ensuring that the aggressor is held accountable for his or her actions. The conviction serves not only as an individual punishment, but also as a sign that society will not tolerate gender-based violence.

Current scenario of gender violence and the importance of prevention

Gender-based violence remains a social scourge, requiring multifaceted approaches that go beyond punishment. Education for respect and equality, from an early age, is fundamental to building a culture of peace. Campanhas raising awareness and strengthening support networks for victims are essential.

It is crucial that reporting violence is always encouraged and that women feel safe to seek help. Além Furthermore, the continuous training of police officers, prosecutors and judges is vital so that cases of domestic violence are treated with due urgency and understanding of the complexity involved.