STJ to Rule on Robinho’s Appeal Against Nine-Year Sentence for Rape in Italy

The Superior Court of Justice (STJ) has scheduled the hearing of an appeal filed by the defense of former footballer Robinho, who was sentenced to nine years in prison for the rape of a woman in Italy. The former striker, who has been imprisoned for 11 months in Tremembé prison in São Paulo, is seeking to overturn the decision that validated his Italian sentence in Brazil. His defense argues that the STJ did not review the sentencing criteria, which, according to them, should have been adjusted to Brazilian legislation. Lawyers are requesting a reduction of the sentence and progression to a semi-open regime, citing Robinho’s clean criminal record and good conduct.

The case dates back to 2013, when Robinho, alongside a friend, was convicted by the Italian judiciary for the sexual assault of a 23-year-old woman at a nightclub in Milan. The trial in Italy went through all judicial instances, with the final ruling in 2022, when the Italian Supreme Court upheld the nine-year sentence. However, by that time, the former player had already returned to Brazil, and extradition was not possible, as the Brazilian Constitution prohibits the extradition of native citizens.

As a result, the Italian government requested that Robinho serve his sentence in Brazil. The request was approved by the STJ in March 2023, leading to his immediate arrest the next day. Since then, he has been in a closed-regime prison, awaiting the outcome of his appeal, which aims to modify the sentence.

Defense’s Appeal and Attempt for Semi-Open Regime

Robinho’s defense team claims that the STJ failed to consider legal differences between Brazil and Italy. Under Italian law, the minimum sentence for such crimes is eight years, while in Brazil, it ranges from six to ten years. The lawyers argue that, based on Brazilian sentencing guidelines, Robinho could have received the minimum six-year sentence, which would make him eligible for a semi-open regime.

Another key argument is that Robinho is a first-time offender with no prior criminal record, which, according to his defense, warrants a reassessment of the penalty. They claim that the Italian ruling was applied in full without individualized consideration under Brazilian law.

The STJ’s virtual session will involve a week-long process, where ministers will analyze the case electronically. The rapporteur will issue the first vote, followed by other justices submitting their votes in the court’s electronic system.

Understanding Robinho’s Conviction in Italy

• Crime: The incident took place in 2013 in Milan, where Robinho and an acquaintance were convicted of sexual assault against a 23-year-old woman.
• Italian Judiciary Decision: The sentence was upheld in all judicial instances, with the final ruling in 2022.
• Italian Government Request: Authorities petitioned Brazil to execute the sentence in the country.
• STJ Decision: In March 2023, the STJ approved the request, leading to Robinho’s imprisonment.
• Defense’s Argument: Lawyers request a sentence review and progression to a semi-open regime.

Key Aspects of the STJ Hearing

1. Sentencing Review – The defense argues that the Italian sentence should have been revised according to Brazilian law.
2. Possibility of Sentence Reduction – If reduced to six years, Robinho could apply for a semi-open regime.
3. Implications of the Decision – If the STJ grants the request, Robinho could leave full imprisonment and serve his sentence with fewer restrictions.

Robinho’s Legal Situation in Brazil

Since his arrest in March 2023, Robinho has been incarcerated at the Tremembé prison, a facility known for housing high-profile inmates. His defense team has worked continuously to challenge the ruling and explore legal alternatives to lessen his punishment.

Brazilian jurisprudence states that foreign sentences must be aligned with national legal principles. However, the STJ ruled that the Italian judgment should be applied in full, without modifications.

Leia Tambem

Câmara dos Deputados lança publicação sobre inteligência artificial e processos eleitorais

Viagem para Veneza e Mini Cooper elétrico integram promoções de shoppings na capital mineira

Tubarão tigre morde jovem de 19 anos e arranca perna em Boa Viagem no Recife

If the STJ modifies the sentence, this could set a precedent for future cases where foreign sentences are enforced in Brazil. The decision could influence legal interpretations of international criminal cooperation.

Impact of Robinho’s Case on Football and Society

Robinho’s conviction had major repercussions in the sports world and public opinion. The case sparked debates about ethics in football and the responsibility of clubs and sponsors in handling allegations of misconduct by athletes. In 2020, while still free, Robinho signed a contract with Santos FC, but after public outcry and sponsor pressure, the club rescinded the deal.

The case also became a symbol of social change, reflecting growing intolerance toward sexual violence. The STJ ruling will be closely watched by social movements, women’s rights organizations, and the general public.

Sexual Violence Data in Brazil

• In 2023, Brazil recorded over 70,000 rape cases, with 60% of victims being minors.
• Only 8% of sexual assault cases result in convictions.
• The average prison sentence for rape in Brazil is seven years.
• A semi-open regime is granted to offenders who serve one-third of their sentence with good behavior.

Historical Cases of Athletes Involved in Sexual Assault

Robinho’s case is not the first involving athletes and sexual violence accusations. Other football players have faced legal proceedings, but few have served long sentences. In several instances, convictions were overturned or sentences reduced. The STJ’s decision on Robinho could set a new legal benchmark for future cases.

Timeline of Robinho’s Case

• 2013 – The incident occurs at a nightclub in Milan, Italy.
• 2017 – Italian courts convict Robinho to nine years in prison.
• 2022 – The Italian Supreme Court upholds the sentence.
• 2023 – The STJ homologates the ruling, ordering Robinho’s arrest.
• 2025 – Robinho’s defense files an appeal for sentence reduction and semi-open regime.

Next Steps in the STJ’s Hearing

The STJ ministers must decide whether to uphold the sentence or grant a review. If Robinho’s request is approved, his sentence may be reduced, allowing him to serve the remainder under a semi-open regime. The ruling is expected to take at least a week, as ministers submit their votes electronically.