New Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus and 270K Plus processors available starting March 26

Intel authorized the publication of analyzes of the new Core Ultra 200S Plus processors for desktops. The lineup includes the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus with 24 cores and the Core Ultra 5 250K Plus with 18 cores, in addition to the KF versions without integrated graphics. The chips hit the market from March 26th with suggested prices of $299 for the 24-core model and $199 for the 18-core model.

These processors bring refinements compared to previous models in the Arrow Lake series. The number of efficiency E cores has increased, boost frequencies have increased by 100 MHz for both P and E cores, and DDR5-7200 memory support replaces the previous DDR5-6400. The internal interconnection also gained speed, going from 2.1 GHz to 3.0 GHz, which helps to reduce latency when accessing memory.

The Intel enabled the 200S Boost technology by default on the new chips. The Intel Binary Optimization Tool tool, available in Intel Application Optimization advanced mode, applies a binary optimization layer that increases the number of instructions per cycle in certain games, even those compiled for different architectures.

Technical configurations of the new processors

The Core Ultra 7 270K Plus has a configuration of 8 P cores and 16 E cores, totaling 24 cores and 24 threads. The base frequencies are 3.7 GHz for the P cores and 3.2 GHz for the E cores, while the maximum boosts reach 5.4 GHz on the P cores and 4.7 GHz on the E cores. The nominal TDP is 125 W, with a peak of up to 250 W.

The Core Ultra 5 250K Plus has 6 P cores and 12 E cores, totaling 18 cores and 18 threads. The base frequencies are 4.2 GHz on the P and 3.5 GHz on the E, with boosts of 5.3 GHz and 4.7 GHz respectively. The nominal TDP remains at 125 W and the maximum at 159 W. Ambas options maintain compatibility with the LGA 1851 platform.

• Support DDR5-7200 memory
• Internal interconnection at 3.0 GHz
• iBOT Tool for Binary Optimization
• KF versions without iGPU available

Processors improve performance in productivity applications. The Core Ultra 7 270K Plus records an average gain of 18% over the previous Core Ultra 7 265K in multitasking tests. The Core Ultra 5 250K Plus advances 26% compared to the Core Ultra 5 245K in the same category.

Performance in multithreaded and single-threaded tasks

In multi-core benchmarks, the Core Ultra 7 270K The model also registers a 21% advantage over the Core Ultra 7 265K and more than doubles the performance of the Ryzen 7 9700X in equivalent scenarios. Quando limited to the 105 W TDP of the Ryzen 7 9700X, the Core Ultra 5 250K Plus delivers 77% more performance.

In single-core tests, the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus advances 1.4% over the The difference for the Ryzen 7 9700X reaches 10% in favor of the Intel chip. The results indicate consistent gains in workloads that require high parallel processing capacity.

Power consumption varies depending on the load. In multicore rendering on the Cinebench 2024, the Core Ultra 7 270K No Blender, the increase reaches 45% compared to the previous model and 151% compared to the equivalent Ryzen. Apesar Furthermore, maximum temperatures do not rise significantly compared to predecessors.

Gaming results and energy efficiency

Gaming tests were carried out at low resolutions such as 720p and 1080p to highlight the impact of the processor. Intel claims that the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus outperforms the Core i9-14900K by an average of 5% in its own internal benchmarks at 1080p. Resultados independents confirm similar gains, although on a smaller scale depending on the title.

Leia Tambem

Colby Minifie confirms Ashley Barrett’s powers in The Boys season five

Napoli x Milan in Serie A with confirmed lineups and where to watch live

New battery test puts Galaxy S26 Ultra ahead of iPhone 17 Pro Max in global ranking

The Core Ultra 7 270K Plus is 10% faster than the Core Ultra 7 265K on average, according to data from Compared to the Ryzen 7 9800X3D, the Intel chip presents a delay of around 20% in the same tests. The model still does not reach the Ryzen with 3D V-Cache technology in purely gaming scenarios.

The Core Ultra 5 250K Plus stands out for its relationship between performance and price. In some 720p titles, it approaches or surpasses the Core i9-14900K despite consuming much less energy. However, it remains behind the Ryzen 7 9800X3D and 9850X3D, with differences reaching 28% and 38% respectively. The 18-core chip is up to 3% slower than the Ryzen 5 7600X3D with just six cores on average.

In games, consumption remains more controlled. The Core Ultra 5 250K The Core Ultra 7 270K

Cost-benefit assessment of new chips

The $199 Core Ultra 5 250K Plus offers a good balance between productive tasks and gaming. Ele delivers versatile performance in this price range, where AMD does not have an equivalent option with the same combination of cores and efficiency. The similar in value Ryzen 5 7500X3D is faster in games, but loses 51% in applications.

The $299 Core Ultra 7 270K Plus ranks well in productivity, outperforming AMD solutions in the same range. In games, the gain of around 5% in FPS does not make up for the price difference for those who only prioritize graphics performance. For around $50 more, AMD options like the Ryzen 7 7800X3D can deliver a greater advantage in titles that require high frame rates.

Reviews highlight that the Core Ultra 5 250K Plus represents an attractive choice for users looking for versatility without spending a lot. The Core Ultra 7 270K Plus pleases those who need high performance in multithreaded applications and accept trade-offs in games. The processors arrive at retail with improvements that reinforce the Intel’s competitiveness on the desktop platform.

Consumption and temperatures under heavy load

During encoding tests on the Handbrake, the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus exceeds 280 W in peaks. The Core Ultra 5 250K Plus fully utilizes its 159 W rating at similar loads. In applications such as rendering, the increase in consumption becomes more evident, but the maximum and average temperatures do not differ much from previous chips in the line.

The new models maintain the focus on relative efficiency, especially the Core Ultra 5 250K Plus, which balances performance and energy well in games. Review data indicates that the refined design allows gains without drastically increasing the cooling requirement.