Trump attacks major newspaper over Iran war coverage while threatening new lawsuits against media
President Donald Trump launched a fierce verbal assault against a major national newspaper, calling its journalists “corrupt and unethical cowards” after the outlet published analysis questioning the concrete achievements of his Iran military campaign. The president disputed the publication’s assessment that little changed after nearly four months of conflict, listing what he described as significant military victories in a lengthy social media post. Trump’s outburst included threats to add the coverage to an existing $15 billion defamation lawsuit against the media organization.
The controversy erupted after reporter Neil MacFarquhar published an article examining whether the recent agreement with Iran accomplished Trump’s original war objectives. The piece highlighted that neither the conflict nor the subsequent deal eliminated what U.S. and Israeli officials consider the main threats from Tehran. While Iran’s nuclear program sustained heavy damage, it was not completely destroyed, with its fate deferred to future negotiations.
Republican lawmakers voice concerns over unfrozen assets and sanctions relief
Conservative voices, including some of Trump’s traditional allies, expressed reservations about specific terms of the Iran agreement. Fox News contributor Marc Thiessen, who maintains a personal relationship with the president, broke ranks on this issue. “I think it’s better that it go to American farmers than the Iranian terrorist regime,” Thiessen stated during a television appearance.
Republican senators registered particular frustration over two financial components of the deal. Trump’s plan to unfreeze $300 billion in Iranian assets drew sharp criticism from lawmakers. Additionally, the administration waived oil sanctions on Iran for 60 days, potentially enabling the country to earn approximately $10 billion through petroleum sales on international markets. These moves sparked debate within conservative circles about whether the agreement favored Tehran’s interests.
Vice President JD Vance claimed significant progress in nuclear discussions with Iran. However, Iranian officials flatly contradicted this assertion. A foreign ministry spokesperson from the theocratic dictatorship stated that Iran made “no new commitments” regarding nuclear inspections, creating confusion about the actual terms negotiated.
President disputes media assessment with detailed military accomplishments list
Trump reacted strongly to the newspaper headline stating “What Changed After Almost Four Months of War? Analysts Say Not Much.” In a detailed social media response, he enumerated what he characterized as transformative results from the military campaign:
- Iranian military capabilities severely degraded
- Naval forces eliminated
- Air force destroyed
- Launching pads and missile manufacturing nearly gone
- Top leadership eliminated
- Iranian economy suffering 250% inflation
- Hormuz Strait reopened
- U.S. stock market and employment at record highs
The president concluded his enumeration with direct criticism: “That’s what’s CHANGED, you corrupt and unethical cowards, and MORE!!” Ninety minutes later, Trump posted another message accusing the newspaper of using “FAKE & MADE UP ‘FACTS” about the war, labeling the coverage “TREASONOUS.” Treason constitutes a capital crime under U.S. law, carrying a maximum death penalty.
Justice Department withdraws subpoenas against other major news organizations
While Trump escalated his rhetoric against one publication, the Justice Department simultaneously withdrew subpoenas targeting reporters from two other major news outlets. The subpoenas would have forced journalists from the Wall Street Journal and Washington Post to testify before a grand jury in Virginia. This reversal came after both organizations challenged the demands through sealed court filings.
Leia Também
Voters cast ballots in New Caledonia’s provincial elections, influencing future French status discussions
Iyo Sky claims Queen of the Ring crown and sets SummerSlam championship showdown with Liv Morgan
Michelle Pfeiffer recalls humiliating Grease 2 audition that launched her Hollywood career
A spokesperson for one of the publications called the original subpoenas “a clear violation of constitutionally guaranteed press freedoms” and characterized them as “another sign of the government seeking to compel journalists to become instruments of its investigations.” The newspaper that drew Trump’s initial ire declined to comment publicly. However, last fall when the president refiled his $15 billion lawsuit, a spokesperson stated: “This is merely an attempt to stifle independent reporting and generate P.R. attention, but The New York Times will not be deterred by intimidation tactics.”
Lincoln Memorial controversy sparks additional lawsuit threats against network
Trump expanded his legal threats beyond the newspaper to include a major television network over its coverage of problems at the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool. The president announced plans to sue the broadcaster for what he described as incomplete reporting on the algae-covered pool, which has experienced serious deterioration and resulted in waterfowl deaths. Trump now attributes the problems to vandalism rather than maintenance issues.
The president alleged the network “failed to report that their close ‘friends,’ Democrats Obama and Biden, spent over 100 Million Dollars on the Reflecting Pool, and it never worked.” Historical records indicate the Obama administration spent approximately $35 million on pool renovations completed in 2012, substantially less than Trump’s claim. A network anchor ran a segment demonstrating the pool’s deterioration by removing a slice of peeling paint floating in the water. “We didn’t peel it away, it was floating there,” the journalist clarified on a morning program.
The restoration work was performed by a no-bid contractor for $15 million, roughly nine times the original cost estimate. Trump stated he would direct any settlement money to the U.S. Treasury, referencing a previous $16 million defamation settlement the network paid in 2024 involving use of the word “rape” in coverage.
New book reveals behind-the-scenes dynamics between president and reporters
A book published by two reporters covering the White House provides insight into Trump’s complex relationship with media figures. Despite calling one journalist a “third-rate reporter” days before a scheduled interview, the president appeared “in a convivial mood” during their actual meeting. The reporter described the pre-interview criticism as a “hip check,” an attempt to establish negotiating leverage before the conversation.
During the interview, Trump discussed topics ranging from trees he wanted to order for White House grounds to details about a planned ballroom and anecdotes about professional golfer Gary Player. The reporters noted they had specific questions requiring answers but didn’t want the interview derailed by tangential discussions. This pattern reflects Trump’s frequent shifting of positions, which can change by the day or even by the hour, creating challenges for journalists covering the administration. After criticizing one reporter sharply during a press conference, Trump called him over afterward and quietly said, “We’re good,” demonstrating the performative nature of some confrontations.
