Latest News (EN)

Businessman James Holder, one of the founders of Superdry, is convicted of rape in a UK trial

James Holder - Getty Images Europe
Photo: James Holder - Getty Images Europe

James Holder, co-founder of fashion retailer Superdry, was convicted of rape after a five-day trial in Tribunal’s Coroa’s Coroa’s Cirencester. The 54-year-old businessman denied the accusations relating to an incident that occurred in May 2022 at Cheltenham, Gloucestershire. A jury of seven men and five women returned the guilty verdict. The court ruling marks a significant development for the British fashion mogul.

Condenação and Rejeição of Pedido of Fiança

Holder, resident of Cheltenham, was acquitted of a charge of assault by penetration by the same jurors who found him guilty of the rape. The incident that resulted in the conviction took place at the victim’s residence. Após the verdict, Recorder David Chidgey rejected Holder’s bail application. The businessman sought to organize his affairs before the sentence. The judge argued that the temptation for him to use his “significant resources” and leave the country would be “very great”. Esta assessment emphasized concerns about breakout risk.

The verdict was handed down in a courtroom in Cirencester, after a week of testimony and analysis of evidence. Rejecting bail indicates how seriously the court views the conviction. The next steps in the process include determining the sentence.

Detalhes from Noite from Incidente in 2022

The court found that James Holder participated in an “improvised outing” on the night of May 6, 2022, in Cheltenham’s city. The businessman’s journey ended in the woman’s apartment, the scene of the crime. The co-founder of Superdry recounted the events of that night to the court. A witness claimed to have called a taxi for Holder and another separately for the victim, with different destinations. Contudo, Holder got into the victim’s taxi. The vehicle was destined for her home address, according to testimony.

The court also heard that Holder fell asleep in the woman’s bed. Nesse In the meantime, his friend occupied the sofa in the apartment’s living room. The victim then chose to sleep on the living room floor. Este unusual arrangement preceded the subsequent facts detailed during the trial. The elements presented to the court were crucial for understanding the context of the aggression.

Relato of Ministério Público and Fuga of Vítima

James Haskell, the prosecutor in the case, detailed the victim’s version to the court, providing a chronology of events inside the apartment. Holder reportedly appeared at the living room door and invited her to join him in the bedroom. The woman declined the invitation, citing tiredness. Apesar refused, Holder pulled her to the bed, starting the aggression. Haskell described that the businessman “continued to touch” the victim. Ele removed her underwear, which she “actively tried to stop.”

The prosecution emphasized the attacker’s persistence during the act. “From time to time he would apologize, but then he would continue,” Haskell said in court. “She was telling him to stop repeatedly.” One of the most sensitive points in the testimony was the moment when the victim “at one point remembered starting to cry, but he still didn’t stop.” The woman managed to escape Holder and leave the room. Ele left the apartment soon after. The victim reported the allegations to police and gave a videotaped interview to detectives in July 2022, providing a solid foundation for the investigation.

  • Holder invited the victim to join him in the bedroom;
  • The woman refused the proposal, expressing tiredness;
  • The businessman pulled her to bed against her will;
  • Holder continued to touch her, removing her underwear;
  • The victim tried to stop the attack and asked him to stop;
  • Ele apologized but persisted in his actions;
  • The woman began to cry, but the aggression did not stop;
  • The victim managed to escape the room and leave the area.

Posicionamento from Superdry over Caso

The company Superdry issued an official statement regarding James Holder’s conviction, seeking to clarify his relationship with the former co-founder and the incident. A spokesperson for the brand reported that Holder resigned as director and employee of Superdry in 2016. Além also said that a consulting agreement he had with the company was terminated in 2019. The statement aims to dissociate the company from Holder’s personal conduct, emphasizing the timeline.

“The case refers to an incident in 2022, long after any role with Superdry had ended,” company representatives said in the statement. Eles reiterated that “the lawsuit is not related to Superdry, its facilities, employees or business activity.” The company chose not to issue further comment as the matter “remains a matter for the court” and is under judicial review.

↓ Continue lendo ↓