Musk quits special government role, shifts focus to Tesla and SpaceX

7 min de leitura
Elon Musk e X Foto: Elon Musk e X - Foto: Algi Febri Sugita / Shutterstock.com

Elon Musk, billionaire and Tesla CEO, announced his departure from Donald Trump’s administration on Wednesday, May 28, 2025, ending his role as special advisor and leader of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). The exit, confirmed by the White House, came two days before the legal 130-day limit of his special term, which began in January. The decision, shared by Musk on X, followed months of public tensions, particularly over Trump’s import tariffs, seen by the entrepreneur as harmful to Tesla’s business. The departure marks the end of a controversial partnership that drew internal and external criticism within the administration. Musk thanked Trump for the opportunity, but no direct conversation occurred between them before the announcement.

Musk’s tenure in the government was marked by initial influence and growing friction. Appointed to lead DOGE, he pledged significant federal budget cuts. His exit, however, reflects strategic disagreements with the White House.

  • Key facts of the exit:
    • Announcement date: May 28, 2025.
    • Role: Special advisor and DOGE leader.
    • Original deadline: May 30, 2025.
    • Main reason: Disagreements over tariff policies.

The billionaire, known for his disruptive approach, leaves the government amid challenges for his companies, particularly Tesla, impacted by the U.S.-China trade war.

Appointment and initial promises

Musk’s appointment to DOGE, announced by Trump in November 2024, generated significant expectations. The billionaire, who financially supported Trump’s campaign with over $300 million, was tasked with reducing federal spending and streamlining the administration. In January 2025, he assumed the role with a goal to cut $1 trillion from the federal deficit. His approach included proposals to reduce the federal workforce and review regulations.

During the initial months, Musk was a central figure in the White House, often seen alongside Trump at public events. In March, during a speech to Congress, the president praised the billionaire’s dedication. However, the relationship began to show signs of strain as Trump’s tariff policies advanced, directly impacting Musk’s businesses.

Tariff conflicts

Trump’s tariffs, particularly on Chinese imports, became a major point of contention with Musk. In April 2025, the administration announced measures, including a 25% increase on imported vehicles and even higher rates on Chinese components. Tesla, reliant on global supply chains, faced significant additional costs. Approximately 40% of materials used in the company’s batteries come from Chinese suppliers, according to recent analyses.

Musk publicly opposed the tariffs, advocating for free trade. In an X post, he shared a video of economist Milton Friedman praising global trade benefits. The billionaire also criticized Peter Navarro, Trump’s trade advisor, calling him a “moron” in a series of messages. The public criticism heightened tensions with the administration.

  • Tariff impacts on Tesla:
    • Increased production costs in the U.S.
    • Chinese retaliation with 125% tariffs on exported models.
    • Suspension of Model S and Model X orders in China.
    • 40% drop in Tesla’s stock price since January.

White House reactions

Musk’s departure was met with official silence from Trump and his team. The White House confirmed the exit but provided no further details. An anonymous source told U.S. media that Musk did not discuss his decision with the president, suggesting an abrupt split. The lack of dialogue reinforces speculation that tariff disagreements were decisive.

Internally, Trump’s allies viewed Musk as a political liability. His critical stance and constant media presence caused discomfort among other administration members. Some advisors believed the association with the billionaire harmed the government’s image, especially amid tariff controversies.

Tesla’s market challenges

Tesla, Musk’s flagship company, faces a complex landscape. The U.S.-China trade war led to retaliations affecting the company’s exports. In April, China imposed 125% tariffs on U.S.-made Model S and Model X vehicles, forcing Tesla to suspend new orders for these models in the Chinese market. The company, which operates a gigafactory in Shanghai, relies on China as its second-largest market, with sales of 657,000 cars in 2024.

Additionally, Tesla faces growing competition from local manufacturers like BYD and Xpeng, offering more affordable vehicles. A 11.5% drop in the company’s China sales in March reflects these challenges. Protests against Musk, linked to his government role, also impacted the brand’s image, with vandalism reported at U.S. dealerships.

Role in DOGE

The Department of Government Efficiency, led by Musk, was created to cut costs and boost federal efficiency. During his tenure, Musk proposed eliminating programs deemed unnecessary and reviewing government contracts. In April, he claimed DOGE was on track to meet the $1 trillion savings goal.

  • DOGE initiatives:
    • Review of federal regulations.
    • Proposal to cut 10% of the public workforce.
    • Analysis of technology and infrastructure contracts.
    • Monthly efficiency reports to Congress.

Despite the promises, implementing the measures faced resistance from lawmakers and unions, who criticized the lack of transparency in Musk’s plans.

Criticism from allies

Musk’s relationship with other government members was marked by friction. Beyond his criticism of Navarro, the billionaire faced opposition from figures like Marco Rubio, Secretary of State, and Howard Lutnick, Commerce Secretary, both tariff supporters. Kimbal Musk, Elon’s brother, also spoke out against Trump’s policies, stating that the tariffs imposed a permanent burden on American consumers.

Musk’s public criticism sparked debates about his loyalty to the administration. A Republican strategist noted that internal disputes, such as the insults exchanged with Navarro, undermined government cohesion. Musk’s exit is seen as an attempt to avoid further strain.

SpaceX impacts

Beyond Tesla, Musk’s SpaceX also felt the effects of tariff policies. The company, which operates the Starlink network, faces regulatory barriers in international markets due to trade tensions. In February, Ontario, Canada, canceled a $68 million contract with Starlink in response to U.S. tariffs.

SpaceX, however, maintains significant U.S. government contracts, including $5.3 billion in rocket launch agreements through 2029. These contracts ensure financial stability, but the company seeks global expansion, which may be hindered by Trump’s protectionist policies.

  • Effects on SpaceX:
    • Contract cancellation in Canada.
    • Regulatory barriers in Asian markets.
    • Reliance on U.S. government contracts.

Political landscape

Musk’s exit comes amid instability for the Trump administration. The tariffs, which sparked protests from businesses and international allies, caused significant global market declines. The Dow Jones Industrial Average dropped over 1,000 points after the tariff announcement, reflecting economic uncertainty.

Republican lawmakers, including some Trump supporters, expressed concerns about the tariffs’ effects on trade and consumer prices. Musk’s departure may amplify these criticisms, as it highlights internal divisions within the administration.

Musk’s future

With his government tenure over, Musk is expected to refocus on his companies. Tesla plans to accelerate development of the Cybercab, an autonomous vehicle, despite tariff-related challenges. The company also aims to diversify its supply chain, increasing component production in the U.S.

At SpaceX, Musk is working to expand the Starlink network and advance space exploration projects, such as Mars missions. Leaving the government allows the billionaire to dedicate more time to these initiatives while navigating a transforming global market.

DOGE legacy

The Department of Government Efficiency will continue under new leadership, but the impact of Musk’s actions remains uncertain. Reports indicate that some of his proposals, like contract reviews, have progressed, but others, such as broad workforce cuts, face legal hurdles. The White House has not announced Musk’s replacement, but sources suggest DOGE will remain active.

  • DOGE next steps:
    • New leader appointment by June.
    • Continuation of regulatory reviews.
    • Monitoring of budget cuts.

Musk’s exit marks the end of a tumultuous phase, but his DOGE initiatives may influence the Trump administration in the coming months.

Luís Henrique Costa é jornalista formado pela FMU, editor-chefe e fundador do Mix Vale, portal de notícias em atividade desde 2013. Responde pela direção editorial do veículo, que cobre Brasil e mundo em economia, benefícios sociais, esportes, tecnologia, ciência e entretenimento. Atua na área há mais de 15 anos e lidera uma equipe de cerca de 15 colaboradores.

Notícias relacionadas