Thailand’s 2025 election ignites fierce three-way battle, deepening political uncertainty and constitutional debate

6 min de leitura

Polls opened across Thailand this Sunday in a critical general election, with the nation bracing for a highly contested tripartite struggle. Conservative, progressive, and populist factions are locked in a close race, leading analysts to anticipate no single party will secure a clear majority. This outcome would inevitably prolong the specter of political instability that has long plagued the Southeast Asian country.

The stage for these early elections was set in mid-December 2024 by Prime Minister Anutin Charnvirakul, amidst an escalating border conflict between Thailand and Cambodia. This move was widely seen by political observers as a strategic maneuver by the conservative leader to capitalize on surging nationalist sentiments across the kingdom.

Anutin had assumed office less than 100 days prior, following the ousting of then-Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra of the populist Pheu Thai party, a decision directly linked to the burgeoning Cambodian crisis. This swift change in leadership underscored the fragile nature of Thai governance.

Deep-Rooted Political Divisions

The Pheu Thai party, historically backed by billionaire former Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra, has seen its standing wane but remains a formidable contender, according to recent polling data. Its populist appeal, though tested by recent political turbulence, continues to resonate with a significant portion of the electorate, particularly in rural heartlands.

Conversely, the progressive Popular Party has consistently led opinion polls throughout the campaign, championing a platform of structural change and comprehensive reforms for Thailand, the region’s second-largest economy. Their message of modernizing governance and addressing entrenched inequalities has captivated younger voters and urban populations seeking a departure from traditional politics.

Thitinan Pongsudhirak, a prominent political scientist at Chulalongkorn University in Bangkok, offered a stark assessment of the current landscape. “This election is fundamentally about whether Thailand can extricate itself from the quagmire, whether it can truly break free from the persistent political instability and economic stagnation,” Pongsudhirak stated. “My preliminary conclusion, I regret to say, is that it will not achieve that break.”

Despite strong challenges to Anutin’s ruling Bhumjaithai party and the Pheu Thai, the Popular Party may struggle to secure an outright parliamentary majority independently. This scenario raises the significant risk of a repeat of its predecessor’s fate, where electoral victory did not translate into governmental power.

A Precedent of Disenfranchisement

The Move Forward party, which paved the way for the current Popular Party, emerged victorious in the previous 2023 elections. However, it was ultimately blocked from forming a government by a military-appointed Senate and conservative members of parliament. This institutional resistance cleared the path for the Pheu Thai’s ascent to power, albeit briefly.

This enduring struggle between the powerful monarchist-conservative establishment and popular democratic movements has consistently generated extended periods of uncertainty. The political landscape has been punctuated by cycles of street protests, sporadic outbreaks of violence, and military coups, creating a challenging environment for sustained governance and reform.

Constitutional Crossroads

Thai voters are also confronting a crucial constitutional referendum during this election. They are being asked to decide whether a new constitution should replace the 2017 charter, a document widely criticized by opponents as military-backed and designed to consolidate power within undemocratic institutions.

Critics specifically point to the powerful Senate, whose members are chosen through an indirect selection process with limited public participation, as a prime example of these concentrated powers. A successful vote for a new constitution could mark a pivotal moment for the nation’s democratic future.

Thailand has seen a tumultuous history of constitutional changes, with 20 different charters since the end of the absolute monarchy in 1932. The majority of these revisions have historically followed military interventions, reflecting the ongoing tug-of-war for political control.

Should the electorate support the drafting of a new national charter, the incoming government and legislators would be empowered to initiate the amendment process within parliament. However, this complex undertaking would necessitate two additional referendums before a new constitution could be formally adopted, highlighting a lengthy path ahead.

Divergent Campaign Strategies Evolve

The ascendance of the Bhumjaithai party, fueled by the heightened nationalism spurred by the Thailand-Cambodia border conflict, coupled with the Pheu Thai’s recent difficulties in late 2024, has significantly reshaped the political landscape. This dynamic has triggered a wave of defections and redefined political battlegrounds, especially in the agriculturally rich and populous regions.

Several political parties have adapted their strategies by recruiting well-known local figures, including those from rival groups, into their ranks. This tactical approach aims to leverage established networks of personal loyalty, which are often indispensable for securing victories in the provincial areas.

The reform-minded Popular Party has also adjusted its campaign tactics, subtly softening its initial anti-establishment rhetoric. They have strategically brought in external talent and experts to bolster their credentials, aiming to convince a broader electorate of their capability to govern effectively.

Former Prime Minister Abhisit Vejjajiva has re-entered the political fray, utilizing his personal appeal to invigorate his once-struggling Democrat Party. The party now stands poised to become a potentially pivotal force in post-election coalition negotiations, capable of swaying the balance of power.

Wish Witchudakornkul, a 20-year-old first-time voter, expressed a hopeful perspective at the Popular Party’s final campaign rally in Bangkok last Friday. Surrounded by a vibrant crowd of supporters dressed in the progressive movement’s signature orange, Witchudakornkul articulated a clear vision for the future.

“I hope that Thailand becomes more fair,” he remarked. “I want to feel that there is more democracy and that people have greater freedom and better opportunities to live their lives without the constant shadow of political turmoil.”

Luís Henrique Costa é jornalista formado pela FMU, editor-chefe e fundador do Mix Vale, portal de notícias em atividade desde 2011. Responde pela direção editorial do veículo, que cobre Brasil e mundo em economia, benefícios sociais, esportes, tecnologia, ciência e entretenimento. Atua na área há mais de 15 anos e lidera uma equipe de cerca de 15 colaboradores.

Notícias relacionadas