Casagrande compares Memphis Depay and Carlitos Tevez at Corinthians and points out differences in commitment
Former player and commentator Walter Casagrande Jr. analyzed the attitude of Memphis Depay and Carlitos Tevez at Corinthians, drawing a clear contrast regarding their dedication to the club. The comparison, made on August 14, 2026, highlights how the two athletes experienced the experience of wearing the black and white shirt in different ways, generating different perceptions among fans. The discussion goes beyond the field, touching on the players’ identity and relationship with Corinthians passion.
Carlitos Tevez’s genuine connection with the Corinthians fans
Full coverage: Latest News (EN)
Carlitos Tevez, since his arrival at Corinthians, demonstrated an immediate and deep identification with the club and its fans. Coming from a humble family on the outskirts of Buenos Aires and having spent time at Boca Juniors, the Argentine established an equal relationship with the fans. His personality was marked by “race” and unconditional dedication in every match, playing whenever he had the minimum physical conditions.
The Memphis Depay approach: marketing versus field delivery
In contrast, Memphis Depay is perceived as a player who selects the games to play in, rarely participating in matches outside the Arena Corinthians. His identification with the fans is seen as something planned and marketing, without the spontaneity that marked Tevez’s time. Casagrande points out that the Dutchman spared himself for a period of six months, aiming for the World Cup, while his teammates faced pressure and salary problems.
- Presidential suite paid for by Corinthians.
- Personal cook at club costs.
- Security guards and armored car available.
These perks contrast sharply with Tevez’s stance, who never demanded such privileges and dedicated himself tirelessly on the field, demonstrating a different commitment.
Impact of the digital era on athletes’ perception
Casagrande’s analysis also addresses the influence of social networks on the way fans evaluate players today. According to him, part of the fans, especially the so-called “TikTok generation” or “virtual fans”, tend to idolize athletes who invest more in image than in continuous performance. This creates a division, where consistent players like Yuri Alberto are criticized in bad phases, while Depay, despite his selectivity, receives plaudits for specific plays.
This phenomenon exposes a change in the culture of Corinthians, a club historically known as “the people’s team”, where race and dedication have always been non-negotiable values. Digital influence, often from those who don’t even frequent the stadium, challenges traditions and the perception of what it means to be a true “Corinthians fan”.
Corinthians philosophy and players’ dedication
The essence of Corinthians, based on passion and struggle, is a central point in Walter Casagrande Jr’s criticism. He states that love for a club is manifested through posture and dedication on the field, and not just through speeches. The perception is that Tevez embodied this philosophy naturally, without needing any tricks to convince the fans of his loyalty.
In this sense, journalist Juca Kfouri, cited in the analysis, reinforces the idea that “Tevez gave himself to Corinthians with passion; Memphis, not”. This phrase encapsulates the fundamental difference in the two players’ relationship with the club’s identity.
Contrasts in the demands and personalities of athletes
The comparison between Tevez and Depay goes beyond technical talent, focusing mainly on personality and level of sacrifice. Carlitos Tevez, with his tireless dedication, personified the dedication that Corinthians fans value so much. He did not seek privileges, but rather the battle on the field, fighting in every play.
On the other hand, Memphis Depay’s demands and lifestyle, despite being a prominent player, raised questions about his total immersion in the club’s culture. The perception that his actions were more aligned with personal interests than with the Corinthians cause culminated in Casagrande’s vision that “whoever was born to be Memphis will never be a Tevez”.

















