STJD imposes eight-game punishment on Abel Ferreira, Palmeiras coach, for recent expulsions By Carolina Costa
6 min read
 |
Coach Abel Ferreira, commander of Palmeiras, received a severe punishment from Superior Tribunal of Justiça Desportiva (STJD), being suspended for a total of eight matches. The decision, taken in the first instance, follows two expulsions recorded in valid games by Campeonato Brasileiro. The measure already takes into account two games that were automatically completed by the Portuguese coach.
The sanction imposed on the technician is divided into two distinct processes. One of them, referring to the classic against São Paulo, resulted in six hook games. The other, related to the expulsion in the match against Fluminense, added two more suspension games to the Abel Ferreira penalty, totaling eight matches.
Given the scenario, the Portuguese coach will be absent from the Palmeiras bench in crucial team commitments. The club, in turn, has already expressed its disagreement with the court’s decision and informed that it will take the appropriate measures to reverse the situation, seeking to file an appeal with a request for suspensive effect.
Details of infringements against São Paulo and Fluminense
The referees’ reports were decisive for the STJD’s decision. In the game against São Paulo, valid for the eighth round of Campeonato Brasileiro, referee Anderson Daronco recorded in the summary that Abel Ferreira called him a “shit”. Além In addition, Daronco reported that the coach kicked the ball that was in the support of Confederação Brasileira of Futebol (CBF).
Later, in the match against Fluminense, Abel Ferreira’s expulsion was justified by referee Felipe Fernandes of Lima in his official report. The judge stated that the coach addressed the assistant Fernanda Gomes Antunes and the fourth referee Luis Tisne in a harsh and rude manner. Lima described that Abel gestured with his arms, clapping his hands ironically and saying profanity and accusatory words, such as “You’re blind, you didn’t see that the side was for our team, c…, you never see anything, b…”.
The legal basis of the punishment: Artigo 258 of the CBJD
Abel Ferreira was included in article 258 of Código Brasileiro of Justiça Desportiva (CBJD). Este article provides punishment for anyone who “acts contrary to sporting ethics”. The scope of this legal provision is vast and aims to curb conduct that, although not necessarily violent, disrespects the liturgy of sport and the authority of arbitration. The interpretation of “sports ethics” often generates debate, but the STJD has historically been strict with attitudes considered disrespectful or that incite animosity.
Article 258 has frequently been used to punish coaches and players for vehement protests, disrespect for the refereeing team or inappropriate behavior on the sidelines. The application of the penalty varies depending on the severity and history of the offender, and can range from warnings to longer suspensions, as in this case. Recurrence or a combination of different types of unsportsmanlike conduct can aggravate the punishment, leading to an accumulation of game suspensions.
Palmeiras strategy and request for suspensive effect
The board of Palmeiras reacted immediately to the STJD’s decision. The Alviverde club considers the punishment “totally inadequate and disproportionate” in relation to the facts that led to the expulsions. Based on this assessment, the legal team at Palmeiras is already mobilized to present an appeal, seeking the annulment or, at least, a reduction of the sentence.
One of the main strategies will be the request for a suspensive effect. Este legal mechanism allows the punishment not to be applied immediately, that is, Abel Ferreira could remain on the bench pending a new trial at a higher court. The suspensive effect is crucial for Palmeiras, given the importance of Abel for the team’s planning and performance, especially at decisive moments in the sporting calendar. The granting of the suspensive effect depends on analyzing the plausibility of the appeal and the risk of irreparable damage to the club if the suspension is maintained.
The history of Abel Ferreira with expulsions
Abel Ferreira has a history of being a very energetic and passionate coach on the pitch, which sometimes results in friction with the refereeing. Essa stance has led to him being sent off on other occasions since taking charge of Palmeiras. Embora often justify his reactions as part of the intensity of football, the accumulation of these situations has generated concern.
Abel’s passion for the game is undeniable, but the line between intensity and violating sporting ethics is a fine one. Clubes and technical committees often face the challenge of balancing freedom of expression with respect for the rules and authorities of the game. The absence of a coach on the field can impact the team’s strategy and morale, forcing adjustments in leadership during matches.
STJD procedures and judgment instances
The STJD, the highest body of Brazilian sports justice, has different judgment bodies to guarantee due legal process. The decision of eight games of suspension for Abel Ferreira was handed down by the second disciplinary committee, which is the first instance for cases like this.
After this stage, the parties involved, in this case Palmeiras, have the right to appeal the decision. The appeal will be forwarded to a higher instance of the STJD, usually the court’s Pleno. Lá, a new trial is held, which may ratify, modify or annul the sentence initially imposed. The appeals process involves presenting new arguments, evidence, and reviewing all case documentation.
The dynamics of trials at the STJD are vital for maintaining discipline in sport, ensuring that the rules are complied with and that the parties have the right to defense.
Repercussion among fans and the sports press
The news of Abel Ferreira’s suspension quickly gained widespread attention among Palmeiras fans and sports media outlets. Nas social media, fans expressed a mixture of outrage at the severity of the sentence and concern about the coach’s absence from important matches. Muitos defended the coach, alleging persecution or disproportionality in the application of the rule.
The press, in turn, analyzed the details of the summaries and precedents of similar cases, raising questions about the consistency of the STJD’s decisions and the impact of punishments in highly competitive championships. The debate about the coaches’ stance and the referees’ actions was also intensified.
Impact on the alviverde calendar
The potential absence of Abel Ferreira from the reserve pool has a direct impact on Palmeiras’s planning for the next rounds. The team, which competes on several fronts, will need to adapt to this situation, delegating command functions to its assistants. The coach’s presence at the edge of the field is essential for reading the game, providing tactical guidance and adjusting strategies in real time, elements that can make a difference in the outcome of a match.
The team will have to demonstrate resilience and focus, maintaining the expected performance even without the physical presence of its main leader.
The club hopes to reverse the situation quickly so as not to have its performance compromised in a year of great ambitions. Maintaining the stability of the squad and coaching staff is crucial for the continued pursuit of titles, and the absence of the head coach is always a destabilizing factor to be managed. The expectation is that the appeal will be analyzed quickly by the court, given the urgency of the situation and the professional’s relevance to national football.
